I took it so seriously that when I stumbled across them in Nelson, they all had to die. Aside the slavers, I never really hated anyone in Fallout 3, but I really hated the Legion. A line in the sand drawn right down to the Earth's core, resulting in a sworn oath to cleanse the wasteland of their filth.This gave the whole game an intense moral cause. The Legion set up a colossal moral barrier for me. Swap the Mojave desert for that terrifying stretch of Syria and Iraq, and Fallout New Vegas becomes tragically prescient. In 2015, given the shocking brutality in the Middle East, it feels scary in a far starker fashion. His vision is clear, his actions informed by persuasive logic, but his idea of Roman standards of human rights becoming the dominant moral philosophy was repugnant.

When you meet Caesar, he's terrifyingly sane.

Yet the set-up never seems overly sensational, or underscored with villainous cliche. Slavery was just one of several ingredients in Caesar's awfulness cake. The Legion lifestyle seemed far more horrific than Eulogy Jones' little operation in Fallout 3. I hated these retrogressive, unnecessarily savage bellends from the moment I first saw them at Nipton, and I hated them because what they represented was genuinely scary. I'm talking about moments such as Caesar and his Legion. It was also, depending on your personal feelings about the politics of the main factions, utterly chilling. New Vegas was more mature and morally challenging. This was a sequel that righted Fallout 3's few wrongs, setting players loose in a grittier, grimier, morally murkier nuclear wasteland, a world far removed from the Disneyland apocalypse of its predecessor, where the light side was zany and the dark side was only ever awful rather than crushingly bleak. Fallout 3 wasn't a bad game - far from it - but its successor Fallout: New Vegas was most definitely better.

Fallout new vegas nuke